Re: pg_pconnect - ?? - Mailing list pgsql-php

From Chris Ruprecht
Subject Re: pg_pconnect - ??
Date
Msg-id p05101218b87b6220cfa3@[192.168.0.6]
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_pconnect - ??  ("Mitch Vincent" <mitch@doot.org>)
Responses Re: pg_pconnect - ??  (Chadwick Rolfs <cmr@shell.gis.net>)
Re: pg_pconnect - ??  (Marco Colombo <marco@esi.it>)
List pgsql-php
Ok, so from what I see on here, pg_pconnect doesn't have any
advantages over pg_connect in my situation. I have the web server
running on the same machine as the database server and yes, I have
allocated 16384 shared buffers (at 8 KB each, this is 128 MB of
shared memory). I have not noticed any connect overhead when opening
a web page which connects to the database (99% of them do), the
connection is instantaneously, so I guess, I don't need to do
anything here.
I was under the impression, that a persistent connection would open
one and only one process which then will be used all the time without
creating more child processes which keep lingering about. I guess, I
was wrong here ...

Best regards,
Chris
--
Chris Ruprecht
Network grunt and bit pusher extraordinaíre

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


pgsql-php by date:

Previous
From: "Mitch Vincent"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_pconnect - ??
Next
From: Chadwick Rolfs
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_pconnect - ??